Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Monday, January 30, 2006
Craziness
I'd be willing to bet that as of last Wednesday, when he announced his resignation as ambassador to Washington, he was all set to go. Something changed in the last five days. What, I wonder?
Friday, January 27, 2006
The only blog you need
Steyn on Canada
As I said, Scary Stephen's no Ron or Maggie. But as a young man in the '80s he was spurred into politics by his clear understanding - unlike most so-called Canadian "conservatives" - that his country had missed out on Thatcher-Reagan economic liberalisation. Essentially, he's a political economist with a libertarian streak: he thinks that if you leave taxpayers with more of their money they're more likely to spend it in ways that do more social good than letting the government disburse it.
And here's where I think Harper could prove Howardesque. He shares two of the Australian Prime Minister's great qualities: he's very secure in his sense of himself, and he has a very shrewd sense of what's politically possible. If he plays those cards right - and I'd bet he will - he could be, as Howard has been, one of those unflamboyantly transformative leaders who leaves the political landscape significantly altered. -- Mark Steyn
And this from his election night blog (which I didn't read until today!) sums it up exactly:
In other words, I overestimated the appeal of the right, the left and the separatists and underestimated the appeal of a party of floundering discredited kleptocrat incompetents who fought one of the most staggeringly awful campaigns in modern political history. Truly, the resilience of the Liberal Party of Canada is amazing.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Al Gore: Mind your own business
"The election in Canada was partly about the tar sands projects in Alberta," Gore said Wednesday while attending the Sundance Film Festival in Utah. "And the financial interests behind the tar sands project poured a lot of money and support behind an ultra-conservative leader in order to win the election . . . and to protect their interests."
Gore believes the issue of the oilsands and the sway he contends the industry holds with Harper didn't garner news coverage during the election because "media concentration has taken a toll on democratic principles around the world, and Canada is no exception."
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Day 2
Drama
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Worth noting - SES was right on
Election thoughts
This morning I'm cautiously optomistic. I like Harper, think he's smart, and hope he can be a great PM. I was hoping for more from Atlantic Canada and from Ontario, but it was not to be. Negative advertising, fear, and outright lying seem to really work in certain areas of the country.
Martin retiring is not a surprise really, although it seems a little sudden. His speech was very gracious and avoids an ugly internal fight. But all the same it's a little sad. A man who only 3 years ago held such incredible promise has come to such a disasterous end. Majority, minority, now opposition and retirement.
I'm also surprised that all the turncoats got re-elected. Brison, Stronach, Martin...it seems voters are fickle that way. On the one hand no one lin the public seems to like it when an MP crosses the floor, on the other hand, they aren't punished either.
Monday, January 23, 2006
A Conservative Minority
- waiting for results until 8:30 sucks. Sucks.
- Ontario is coming along, but still isn't ready to take the plunge; same for Atlantic Canada
- Quebec was a pleasant surprise, including the only independant member. The Bloc vote faded down the stretch, as Paul Wells said it would
- Once again, the Liberal vote was a couple of points higher than the polls said. Maybe some people are ashamed of telling pollsters they'll vote liberal...
- Stephen Harper will be a good PM, and hopefully cautious. No one, and I mean no one, wants another election in the next year or two.
- The west voted for significant change (other than Goodale in Wascana); Landslide Annie even lost her seat.
- The trend is interesting: Liberal majority, minority, opposition. But they salvaged over 100 seats, which is more than most people thought. Who knows if they will keep going down, or recover, in the months ahead.
More tomorrow...
Go time
interesting poll
Did you change your voting decision over the course of the election campaign? |
Yes - I was undecided but made my decision during the campaign | 5300 votes | (21 %) | |
No - I always knew which way I was voting | 20024 votes | (79 %) | |
Total Votes: 25324 |
Why you should vote
Why should we vote at each and every opportunity?
I'm not going to bore you with bromides about civil duty. Vote because if you don't, at some point some miserable cuss will take the right away from you. Or some pompous I-know-better-than-you type will decide you're not interested enough or well-informed enough and -- wait for it -- take away your vote in the name of preserving democracy.
Don't think it could happen? Elections Canada and our benighted political class have already taken away your right to speak out during an election, the right of organizations you belong to speak out (except for registered political parties), your right to donate as much of your money to whomever you want in an election, and your right to spoil your ballot in protest -- all in the name of preserving freedom and democracy.
Sites I will be checking all day long
Sunday, January 22, 2006
the lighter side of the campaign
Image you'd rather not dwell upon:
"This is like a live grenade has just been thrown down Paul Martin's pants." Frank Graves, president of EKOS Research Associates, describes the RCMP investigation's impact.
The leaders
"What role do you think faith should play in developing public policy, and what is the place of religious institutions in contemporary Canadian society?"
Very, very interesting. Harper and Layton are both very good, I couldn't really understand what Martin was trying to say, and Duceppe had a communications person respond that they wouldn't be responding. Nice.
Another election round up
127 Gomery summed up AdScam: "A story of greed, venality and misconduct" featuring "a complex web of financial transactions among Public Works ... Crown corporations and communication agencies, involving kickbacks and illegal contributions to (the Liberal) party."138 Gun registry: Supposed to cost $2 million, now at nearly $2 billion (even AG can't fathom it), with gun crimes rising.141 HRDC boondoggle: $1 billion blown on dubious job-creation projects (including a fountain in Shawinigan).
142 Helicopters: Cancelling contract to replace aging Sea Kings in 1993 cost $500 million and put troops at risk. New contract finally issued in July 2005.
145 Shawinigate: Chretien lied about intervening to secure a federal business loan for an associate in his riding. Later said such interventions were "the normal operation."
161 Tax Freedom Day in 1993: June 6. Last year: June 26, according to Fraser Institute.
170 Encouraged Corrections Canada to release inmates as early as possible -- prisons boss said goal was 50% release rate.
173 2005: Established $3.7-million pilot project to set up tattoo parlours in prisons.
178 2002: Senate Committee on National Security and Defence said Armed Forces were so overstretched they should step down from all peacekeeping operations for two years.
193 2001: [Jean Chretien] Did nothing for 25 Canadians killed in 9/11, delayed visiting attack site. 194 Blamed U.S. "greed" for terrorism.
216 Peacekeeping: [Canada is] 36th, according to UN.
217 Personal income tax burden: Highest in G-8, says OECD.
218 Marginal tax rates: [Canada is] Second only to China, says C.D. Howe Institute.
Seat projections and endorsements
"I always liked that Gilles [Duceppe]", said Cherry. "He wears snappy suits. Nice hair. I'm right behind Gilles and everything you're trying to accomplish."
Friday, January 20, 2006
no election results until 10PM Eastern????
So the results wont be available on news websites, but TV is ok because of blackouts. Unless you have digital cable or satellite...I think.CBC Radio and CBC TV live election specials will begin 30 minutes before the polls close in each broadcast area. CBC Newsworld's live election special will begin across the country at 9 p.m. EST. To conform to the law, a blackout will be in effect in B.C. and the Yukon from 6:30 p.m. PST until the poll close there at 7 p.m.
The Daily Show on our election
Thursday, January 19, 2006
You must read Andrew Coyne
Election update #78987678890
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Election update
And in other news via AC, CTV is burying its own polls:
The first night, maybe they were worried it was a rogue poll. But two nights in a row? It was 42-24 on Tuesday night. It's 41-25 this time. Sixteen points. The largest gap of the campaign, in two consecutive polls. Majority territory. THAT'S BIG NEWS. Isn't it?
The next morning: here's that poll: C: 41% L: 25% NDP: 17% Bloc : 12% Green: 5%, and 2/3 of Canadians want a change in government
Would someone explain to me how SES can say it's 5, EKOS 10 and Strategic Counsel 16?
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
18 points?
Choose your PM
Monday, January 16, 2006
Pigs are flying
UPDATE: A realignment in the making?
Canadian soldiers
Sunday, January 15, 2006
Oh my
And they are up in Quebec and close in the GTA. Wow.
Update: Coyne has more, including this: More than half of all voters - 52% - think the Tories will win and "that this would be good for the country."
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Harper biography
...the drift of Mulroney conservatism away from any semblance of a libertarian agenda brought Mr. Harper to the Reform Party, and ultimately to a seat in Parliament; his impatience with Preston Manning's populism sent him fleeing to the ideologically more comforting National Citizens' Coalition; the disarray of the Canadian Alliance party under Stockwell Day lured him back into politics; the threat of unending hegemonic Liberal government under the then-popular Paul Martin spurred him to negotiate the union of the Alliance and Progressive Conservative parties, and the implosion of the Martin government and its troubled re-election campaign now has Mr. Harper on the cusp of real power.
We interrupt election coverage
campaign update
"But the Liberal party under Paul Martin isn't what it was. Paul Martin's Liberal party needs a time out -- to heal itself, clean itself up, decide what it believes. I'm asking you to change your vote."
A little more than 79 per cent of the $7.5 million provided since the last election through Canadian Heritage's Celebrate Canada program funded projects based in Liberal ridings, the newspaper says. As well, projects based in Quebec received more than half of the total amount spent by the national program.
The Conservative party will today receive an official endorsement from the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples, a group that represents off-reserve natives, sources have told CanWest News Service.
G&M endorses the Conservatives
1. While the past 12 years have been relatively good ones, the law of diminishing returns has been eroding Liberal effectiveness since at least the 2000 election. A change of leadership in 2003 has failed to reverse the process.
2. Then there is this matter of the culture of entitlement that has taken deep root within the Liberal Party. C. D. Howe may have been arrogant in invoking closure before debate even began on the pipeline bill in 1956, but at least he didn't hold up his chewing gum and announce he was entitled to his entitlements.
3. Change is essential in a democracy. A perpetual lease on 24 Sussex Drive fuels the sense of entitlement that blurs the line between private gain and public good. Just as bad, a perpetual lease on Stornoway discourages the discipline and moderation required of an alternative government.
Friday, January 13, 2006
New Liberal strategy, just like the old Liberal strategy...
Platforms
Another
Must read on the Canadian election
There are a lot of bleeding hearts around who just don't like to see people with helmets and guns. All I can say is, go on and bleed, but it is more important to keep law and order in the society than to be worried about weak-kneed people. —Pierre Elliot Trudeau, October 13, 1970We declared martial law in a Canadian city after terrorists kidnapped two people.
Not even George W. Bush did that.
After 9/11.
After al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans.
But we did.
Choose your Canada.
Polls solidifying (via Bourque)
Ekos Jan 10-12: CP 37.6% Lib 28.3% Ndp 18.1% Bq 11.6% Gp 3.7%
Gregg Jan 10-11: CP 39% Lib 27% Ndp 16% Bq 12%
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Election roundup
Even the Toronto Star has turned against the Liberals :
What's wrong with a Liberal campaign now free-falling toward a jolting landing is what's wrong with Paul Martin as prime minister. Contradictory, inconsistent and still searching for a focus, this Liberal tour and Martin's leadership reflect the dangers of power exercised without discipline.
In other news, there is a BC Conservative candidate headed to trial for smuggling. You think that might come up in the vetting process, no? Anyway, the Tories are sticking by him.
Both the Libs and NDP officially released their full platform yesterday; Conservatives were going to and then thought better of it.
Oh, and I guess the Conservatives have said they would undo the income tax reduction the Libs announced in November. I know I said they wouldn't but I was wrong. And that's a dumb policy by the way.
Finally, this is the best quote I've seen in relation to the ad the Libs released and then pulled:
I know! Let's imply Harper would impose martial law! No -- let's make the soldiers the bad guys, even as they're being shot at in Afghanistan! I've got it! Let's do both!
Update: This is even better:
New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton ridiculed Liberal scare tactics saying Martin is resorting to "threats" and "manipulations" in debates and TV ads.Martin "has nothing left to say to Canadians other than to tell them that unless they vote Liberal, the sun will not rise, spring will not come, and volcanoes will destroy the Earth" if Liberals aren't re-elected, Layton said in his written speech. "I don't think that's going to work this time Paul."
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Liberal attack ads
French debate
Liberal platform leaked
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Debate wrap up
You don't amend the constitution of Canada because you're nine points back. A prime minister who valued the parchment of the constitution above his own hide would understand that. -- Paul Wells
Martin was simply ghastly. I've never seen him worse. Blustery, shouting, waving, wildly off-topic. Most important, in the entire night, he never gave me a single reason to vote for him.
Monday, January 09, 2006
Debate headline
EKOS: CONSERVATIVES 43%, LIBERALS 29%...(Developing) (btw that projects to about 170 seats)
Polls
- Decima has it 36-27, which if it held would be the worst popular vote for the Grits ever, eclipsing even the 1984 rout.
- WORSE: Ekos apparently has numbers that are so shocking they won't release them -- they had to go back into the field to make sure. (Thanks to YadaYada for the tip. Follow the thread for other commenters' reactions.)
- WORSER: Global National (via Springer) apparently puts the Tories up by 11.
Polls show Tory lead; debate tonight
Saturday, January 07, 2006
Election update
CPAC-SES Jan 3-5: CP 34 Lib 33 NDP 17 BQ 11 GP 5
Ipsos: CP 35% Lib 31% Ndp 18% Gp 5%
Gregg Jan 3-5: CP 33% Lib 31% Ndp 17% Bq 13% Gp 6%
Tories are up in Quebec, taking votes from the Libs. Several polls have not confirmed what looks like a trend. Who would have thunk it? And apparently Landslide Annie is in trouble in her Edmonton riding.
Friday, January 06, 2006
A reminder
A blind activist in China and his family have been placed under house arrest for four months and he was beaten by thugs when he tried to venture out, after exposing forced abortions in his home province on the east coast.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
When it rains
The RCMP is looking into a controversial $4.8-million grant that was awarded to a pro-Canada group at the time of the 1995 referendum on Quebec sovereignty, officials have told The Globe and Mail.
Spend, spend, spend
That's over $7-billion. And there's still almost three weeks to go. What will they spend when they're really in trouble?
The tide is turning?
Sharon
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
Best election site
On my mind today
How CPP is better than US social security - it actually exists (hey that's a start) and is independently invested. At least that's the story
The Alberta healthcare story from a couple of weeks ago . Reducing wait times and using resources more efficiently, a model that could be adopted accross the province and the country. Maybe. They're still looking at it. BTW, anyone notice that healthcare hasn't been much of an issue yet? Just wait...
Giving up organic food , because it's a silly indulgence of the relatively wealthy. That ought to annoy a few people.
Monday, January 02, 2006
Election in full swing
- There's this one, about relocation contracts for public servants being awarded to golf courses and resorts.
- This one, about the entertainment lobby paying for liberal fundraiser
- This one about Goodale's ministerial office being used for partisan business